Lunar 302 Posted June 28, 2021 Well either way its 2 weeks from now. In estimated 10 days the test server will open publicly to anyone, at the same time the entire pre-patch note will be available. The reason the topics name is like this, because its about OGH CM. I would not add every possible mechanic, but nearly all. But it would mean its another way for the materials. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
11099941 16 Posted June 28, 2021 Wait, so the patch is 10 days from now regardless? If that's the case, then might as well add it anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lunar 302 Posted June 28, 2021 No, the test server will open 10 days from now. The time is to finish up the last parts and do some nice polishing of what is already out in there. That means in short you will be able to test anything of the new things starting at the point of test server open -> patch release including the pre-note topic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulquiorra - Sama 10 Posted June 28, 2021 How many days? After the test server is open to the official release? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lunar 302 Posted June 28, 2021 Well, lets see... first january of 2099 or 2nd? How many days is it till first of january 2099? Im just kidding, that'd see based on how it goes obviously. But you can see yourself the progress at that point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulquiorra - Sama 10 Posted June 28, 2021 (edited) I see But i vote no I know that we need content that can explain the necessity of 4th jobs But i really want them, even with some restricitions, like "No Fortessa" or "No Instances" or even "PVP Only" The other quests and custom contents can be added little by little after that Ofc this is just my opinion Edited June 28, 2021 by Ulquiorra - Sama Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CSingularity 4 Posted June 28, 2021 Adding content in smaller more frequent patches would likely be more appealing to the player base. The meme at this point is "the patch will never come" (or 2099). The problem is that many people actually believe it, and I know elsewhere I've seen at least one server admin burn out trying to add all the "new" content (at the time) at once, so their patch really never did come. We certainly are looking forward to the new content, but we're also not wanting to see you burn out on it. It goes without saying that anything I'm saying here is my own opinion. Working in software development myself, the importance of "just get something delivered and we'll [add to it/fix it/refine it] afterward" is something I hear often, because most people just don't have the attention span to wait and would rather get a bunch of "small, mostly working" updates now than a "large fully working" update much later. I voted no for this reason. With the logic of smaller patches, it's something that reasonably can be said to "go in the next one" and keep it smaller that way . 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
koalaasz 2 Posted June 28, 2021 10 minutes ago, CSingularity said: Adding content in smaller more frequent patches would likely be more appealing to the player base. The meme at this point is "the patch will never come" (or 2099). The problem is that many people actually believe it, and I know elsewhere I've seen at least one server admin burn out trying to add all the "new" content (at the time) at once, so their patch really never did come. We certainly are looking forward to the new content, but we're also not wanting to see you burn out on it. It goes without saying that anything I'm saying here is my own opinion. Working in software development myself, the importance of "just get something delivered and we'll [add to it/fix it/refine it] afterward" is something I hear often, because most people just don't have the attention span to wait and would rather get a bunch of "small, mostly working" updates now than a "large fully working" update much later. I voted no for this reason. With the logic of smaller patches, it's something that reasonably can be said to "go in the next one" and keep it smaller that way . while I agree with everything you said I still voted yes because I believe the massive update will be better for the server, we're already on a content drought so waiting a week more will in my mind not change it, but for future content I agree that it needs to be updated faster, even if with some bugs, unless the bugs are game breaking it is part of the development cycle of games, I've lost count of how many classes or bosses had bugs(sometimes even game breaking) on WoW and still it's to date the most played mmorpg of all time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonami 0 Posted June 28, 2021 I vote for yes, that instance is necessary, waiting one or two more weeks will be worth it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thibazu 4 Posted June 28, 2021 2 hours ago, tonami said: I vote for yes, that instance is necessary, waiting one or two more weeks will be worth it how is it necessary ? Adding this instance doesn't add temporal circlet, we already would have had access to that with purgatory. You only get "easier" MWK / MKK and a chance of getting Himmelmez. I wouldn't call that necessary 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonami 0 Posted June 28, 2021 28 minutes ago, thibazu said: how is it necessary ? Adding this instance doesn't add temporal circlet, we already would have had access to that with purgatory. You only get "easier" MWK / MKK and a chance of getting Himmelmez. I wouldn't call that necessary As I understand it, you can also get the crystals in this instance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hypermage2 5 Posted June 29, 2021 On 6/28/2021 at 12:29 PM, thibazu said: how is it necessary ? Adding this instance doesn't add temporal circlet, we already would have had access to that with purgatory. You only get "easier" MWK / MKK and a chance of getting Himmelmez. I wouldn't call that necessary assuming it stays that way forever (anyone remember broken weps/cor core/unkown parts dropping from fort dun/pit). There's precedence for these things changing, best to expect it will happen again I say. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silver 0 Posted July 2, 2021 On 6/28/2021 at 10:09 PM, CSingularity said: Adding content in smaller more frequent patches would likely be more appealing to the player base. The meme at this point is "the patch will never come" (or 2099). The problem is that many people actually believe it, and I know elsewhere I've seen at least one server admin burn out trying to add all the "new" content (at the time) at once, so their patch really never did come. We certainly are looking forward to the new content, but we're also not wanting to see you burn out on it. It goes without saying that anything I'm saying here is my own opinion. Working in software development myself, the importance of "just get something delivered and we'll [add to it/fix it/refine it] afterward" is something I hear often, because most people just don't have the attention span to wait and would rather get a bunch of "small, mostly working" updates now than a "large fully working" update much later. I voted no for this reason. With the logic of smaller patches, it's something that reasonably can be said to "go in the next one" and keep it smaller that way . I said it before, frequent smaller updates is better, but hey, they prefer massive "almost one year interval" updates. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lunar 302 Posted July 5, 2021 On the 10th of July the test server will open publicly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites